The coupling and coordination of " production-living-ecological" functions in shrinking cities in the Yellow River Basin

LEI Min; JIANG Xingyue; WANG Rong; ZHENG Qing; LIU Hong; CUI Qiuyu

doi:10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2024-03-011

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

The coupling and coordination of " production-living-ecological" functions in shrinking cities in the Yellow River Basin

更新时间：2024-06-17

- The coupling and coordination of " production-living-ecological" functions in shrinking cities in the Yellow River Basin
- Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition) Vol. 54, Issue 3, Pages: 461-471(2024)
- 作者机构：
  
  1.西北大学　城市与环境学院，陕西　西安　710127
  2.云南广成工程建设有限公司，云南　保山　678000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2024-03-011
  CLC： K901
- Published：25 June 2024，
  
  Received：27 June 2023，
扫描看全文
LEI Min, JIANG Xingyue, WANG Rong, et al. The coupling and coordination of " production-living-ecological" functions in shrinking cities in the Yellow River Basin. [J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition) 54(3):461-471(2024)
DOI：

LEI Min, JIANG Xingyue, WANG Rong, et al. The coupling and coordination of " production-living-ecological" functions in shrinking cities in the Yellow River Basin. [J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition) 54(3):461-471(2024) DOI： 10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2024-03-011.

摘要

利用第五、第六和第七次全国人口普查资料对黄河流域的收缩城市进行识别并测算其收缩强度，借助多指标综合评价法、耦合协调度模型分析2010年、2015年和2020年收缩城市的“三生”功能大小及耦合协调度，进一步运用随机森林模型探究其关键影响因素。结果表明：在黄河流域内90个地级市(州、盟)中，持续收缩型城市有27个，阶段收缩型城市有9个，潜在收缩型城市有29个，城市收缩现象显著；不同区域收缩城市的“三生”功能水平差异显著，其中生产和生活功能整体呈上升态势；“三生”功能的耦合协调度呈现由勉强协调向初级协调发展的特征，中、下游区域协调度优于上游，经济社会的快速发展和人民生活水平的提高有助于“三生”功能的耦合协调发展。

Abstract

On the basis of the fifth

sixth and seventh national population census data

we identify the shrinking cities in the Yellow River Basin and measure their shrinkage intensity. The multi-index comprehensive evaluation method and the coupling coordination model were used to analyze the size of the " production-living-ecological" functions and the coupling coordination scheduling of shrinking cities in 2010

2015 and 2020. We also use the random forest model to explore its key influencing factors. The results show that among the 90 prefecture-level cities (stages and leagues) in the Yellow River Basin

there are 27 continuous contracting cities

9 stage contracting cities and 29 potential contracting cities. The phenomenon of urban contraction is significant. During the study period

the production and living functions of the shrinking cities in the Basin were on the rise as a whole

and the level of " production-living-ecological" functions in different regions was significantly different. The coupling coordination degree of the shrinking cities’ " production-living-ecological" functions was characterized by the development from barely coordinated to primary coordinated development. The coordination degree of the middle and lower reaches was better than that of the upper reaches. The development of economic society and the improvement of people’s living standards contributed to the coupling and coordinated development of the " production-living-ecological" functions.

关键词

收缩城市“三生”功能耦合协调随机森林黄河流域

Keywords

shrinking cities"production-living-ecological" functionscoupling and coordinationrandom forestYellow River Basin

references

HÄUßERMANN H, SIEBEL W. Die schrumpfende stadt und die stadtsoziologie[M]//Soziologische Stadtforschung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 1988: 78-94.

MARTINEZ-FERNANDEZ C, AUDIRAC I, FOL S, et al.Shrinking cities: Urban challenges of globalization[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2012, 36(2): 213-225.

SCHETKE S, HAASE D. Multi-criteria assessment of socio-environmental aspects in shrinking cities. Experiences from eastern Germany[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2008, 28(7): 483-503.

WEAVER R, HOLTKAMP C. Geographical approaches to understanding urban decline: From evolutionary theory to political economy…and back？[J]. Geography Compass, 2015, 9(5): 286-302.

BLANCO H, ALBERTI M, OLSHANSKY R, et al. Shaken, shrinking, hot, impoverished and informal: Emerging research agendas in planning[J]. Progress in Planning, 2009, 72(4): 195-250.

FELT W, CHIN K Y, REMY C D. Contraction sensing with smart braid McKibben muscles[J]. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2016, 21(3): 1201-1209.

吴康, 龙瀛, 杨宇. 京津冀与长江三角洲的局部收缩：格局、类型与影响因素识别[J]. 现代城市研究, 2015, 30(9): 26-35.

WU K, LONG Y, YANG Y. Urban shrinkage in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region and Yangtze River Delta: Pattern, trajectory and factors[J]. Modern UrbanResearch, 2015, 30(9): 26-35.

杨琳, 何邕健. 吉林省收缩城市的空间分布与影响因素分析[J]. 西部人居环境学刊, 2018, 33(3): 21-27.

YANG L, HE Y J. Research on spatial distribution and influencing factors of shrinking cities in Jilin Province[J]. Journal of Human Settlements in West China, 2018, 33(3): 21-27.

陈肖飞, 郜瑞瑞, 韩腾腾, 等. 人口视角下黄河流域城市收缩的空间格局与影响因素[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(6): 37-46.

CHEN X F, GAO R R, HAN T T, et al. Spatial pattern and influencing factors of urban shrinkage in the Yellow River Basin from the perspective of population change[J]. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(6): 37-46.

杨东峰, 龙瀛, 杨文诗, 等. 人口流失与空间扩张：中国快速城市化进程中的城市收缩悖论[J]. 现代城市研究, 2015, 30(9): 20-25.

YANG D F, LONG Y, YANG W S, et al. Losing population with expanding space: Paradox of urban shrinkage in China[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2015, 30(9): 20-25.

高舒琦, 龙瀛. 东北地区收缩城市的识别分析及规划应对[J]. 规划师, 2017, 33(1): 26-32.

GAO S Q, LONG Y. Distinguishing and planning shrinking cities in northeast China[J]. Planners, 2017, 33(1): 26-32.

刘再起, 肖悦. 中国收缩型城市的地理分布、形成原因及转型发展路径[J]. 税务与经济, 2021(3): 1-8.

LIU Z Q, XIAO Y. Geographical distribution, formati-on reasons and transformation development path of China’s shrinking cities[J]. Taxation and Economy, 2021(3): 1-8.

韩冬. 京津冀城市群收缩格局、类型及影响因素研究：以张家口市为例[J]. 城市, 2021(12): 34-44.

HAN D. The study on the shrinkage pattern, type and influence factors of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration: The case study of Zhangjiakou City[J]. City, 2021(12): 34-44.

衣霄翔, 邹志翀, 梁晓倩, 等. 黑龙江省城市收缩现象及问题研究[C]//共享与品质——2018中国城市规划年会论文集(12城乡治理与政策研究). 杭州: 中国城市规划学会, 2018: 403-411.

杨友, 谢宇鹏, 王荣荣. 张家口市城市收缩水平测度及机制分析[J]. 河北北方学院学报(自然科学版), 2021, 37(1): 55-60.

YANG Y, XIE Y P, WANG R R. Measurement and mechanism analysis of urban contraction level in Zhangjiakou[J]. Journal of Hebei North University(Natural Science Edition), 2021, 37(1): 55-60.

杨晓娟, 肖宁, 赵柏伊. 收缩语境下资源型城市县域空间规划策略与实践：以陕西省略阳县为例[J]. 规划师, 2019, 35(16): 82-88.

YANG X J, XIAO N, ZHAO B Y. County level spatial planning strategies and practice of resource based cities in the context of contraction: Lueyang County, Shaanxi Province[J]. Planners, 2019, 35(16): 82-88.

龙瀛, 吴康, 王江浩. 中国收缩城市及其研究框架[J]. 现代城市研究, 2015, 30(9): 14-19.

LONG Y, WU K, WANG J H. Shrinking cities in China[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2015, 30(9): 14-19.

黄金川, 林浩曦, 漆潇潇. 面向国土空间优化的三生空间研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(3): 378-391.

HUANG J C, LIN H X, QI X X. A literature review on optimization of spatial development pattern based on ecological-production-living space[J]. Progress in G-eography, 2017, 36(3): 378-391.

程婷, 赵荣, 梁勇. 国土“三生空间”分类及其功能评价[J]. 遥感信息, 2018, 33(2): 114-121.

CHENG T, ZHAO R, LIANG Y. Production-living-ecological space classification and its functional evaluation [J]. Remote Sensing Information, 2018, 33(2): 114-121.

逯承鹏, 纪薇, 刘志良, 等. 黄河流域甘肃段县域“三生”功能空间时空格局及影响因素识别[J]. 地理科学, 2022, 42(4): 579-588.

LU C P, JI W, LIU Z L, et al. Spatial-temporal pattern and influencing factors of the ”production-living-eco-logical” functional space of the Yellow River Basin at county level in Gansu, China[J]. Scientia Geograp-hica Sinica, 2022, 42(4): 579-588.

李强, 苏迎庆, 冯珍珍, 等. 汾河流域三生空间功能耦合协调研究[J]. 中国水土保持科学(中英文), 2021, 19(5): 115-125.

LI Q, SU Y Q, FENG Z Z, et al. Study on production-living-ecological space function coupling coordination in Fen river basin[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 19(5): 115-125.

魏璐瑶, 陆玉麒, 马颖忆, 等. 江苏省乡村“三生”功能耦合协同测度及格局演化[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2021, 37(12): 1596-1608.

WEI L Y, LU Y Q, MA Y Y, et al. The coupling coordination and pattern evolution of ”production-living-ecological” functions in rural areas of Jiangsu Provin-ce[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2021, 37(12): 1596-1608.

魏小芳, 赵宇鸾, 李秀彬, 等. 基于“三生功能”的长江上游城市群国土空间特征及其优化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(5): 1070-1079.

WEI X F, ZHAO Y L, LI X B, et al. Characteristics and optimization of geographical space in urban agglomeration in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River based on the function of ”production-living-ecologic-al” [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019, 28(05): 1070-1079.

路昌, 徐雪源, 周美璇. 中国三大城市群收缩城市“三生”功能耦合协调度分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(3): 76-88.

LU C, XU X Y, ZHOU M X. Analysis on coupling coordination degree of ”three life” functions in shrinking cities of China’s three major urban agglomerations[J]. World Geographical Research, 2023, 32(3): 76-88.

夏慧雯, 焦胜, 胡加琦. 长株潭城市群“三生”空间动态演化与功能测度[C]//面向高质量发展的空间治理——2021中国城市规划年会论文集(08城市生态规划). 成都: 中国城市规划学会, 2021: 118-126.

陕永杰, 魏绍康, 原卫利, 等. 长江三角洲城市群“三生”功能耦合协调时空分异及其影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(16): 6644-6655.

SHAN Y J, WEI S K, YUAN W L, et al.Spatial temporal differentiation and influencing factors of couplingcoordination of”production-living-ecological” functi-ons in Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration[J]. ACTA Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(16): 6644-6655.

焦庚英, 杨效忠, 黄志强, 等. 县域“三生空间”格局与功能演变特征及可能影响因素分析：以江西婺源县为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(5): 1252-1267.

JIAO G Y, YANG X Z, HUANG Z Q, et al. Evolution characteristics and possible impact factors for the changing pattern and function of ”production-living-ecological” space in Wuyuan County[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(5): 1252-1267.

李欣, 方斌, 殷如梦, 等. 村域尺度“三生”功能与生活质量感知空间格局及其关联：以江苏省扬中市为例[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(4): 599-607.

LI X, FANG B, YIN R M, et al. Spatial pattern and association of production-living-ecological function and life quality on the village scale: A case of Yangzhong City, Jiangsu Province[J]. Scientia Geographica Sini-ca, 2020, 40(4): 599-607.

孙平军, 刘菊, 罗宁, 等. 成渝地区双城经济圈收缩城市的空间格局与影响因素：基于第五、六、七次全国人口普查数据的分析[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(1): 46-56.

SUN P J, LIU J, LUO N, et al. The spatial pattern of shrinking cities in Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle and its influencing factors: An analysis based on the 5th, 6th and 7th national census data[J]. Journal of Southwest University(Natural Science Edition), 2022, 44(1): 46-56.

BREIMAN L. Random forests, machine learning 45[J]. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2001, 2: 199-228.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Ecological efficiency evaluation and attribution analysis of urban agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin

The population distribution dynamics and habitat selection of characteristic protection villages in the Yellow River Basin

Key villages of rural tourism in the Yellow River Basin and their network attention levels research on the law of spatial differentiation

The correlation pattern and regional types of urban population and land use changes in the Yellow River Basin

Coupling coordination and influencing factors analysis of high-quality development of " resource-population-industry" in the Yellow River Basin

Related Author

ZHENG Qing

JIANG Xingyue

YANG Chen

LEI Min

LIU Hong

SUN Weihong

LUO Fei

RUI Yang

Related Institution

College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University

Yellow River Institute of Shaanxi Province, Northwest University

School of Historical Culture and Tourism, Xi’an University

School of Economics and Management, Northwest University

Key Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for Middle and Lower Yellow River Regions, Ministry of Education, Henan University

⁰