基于3种降水产流方案的洪水过程模拟研究以西南地区孙水河流域为例

吕小余; 李占玲; 李昕潼; 叶瀛韬

doi:10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2024-03-003

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于3种降水产流方案的洪水过程模拟研究以西南地区孙水河流域为例

海绵城市 | 更新时间：2024-06-17

- 基于3种降水产流方案的洪水过程模拟研究以西南地区孙水河流域为例
- Simulation on flood processes based on three rainfall runoff schemesA case study of Sunshui River Basin in Southwest China
- 西北大学学报（自然科学版） 2024年54卷第3期页码：366-377
- 作者机构：
  
  1.中国地质大学〔北京〕　水资源与环境学院，北京　100083
  2.中国地质大学〔北京〕　水利部地下水保护重点实验室〔筹〕，北京　100083
- 作者简介：
  
  吕小余，男，从事水文学及水资源研究，xiaoyulv2022@163.com。
  李占玲，女，副教授，博士，从事水文学及水资源研究，zhanling.li@cugb.edu.cn。
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金面上项目(42171047)
- DOI：10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2024-03-003
  中图分类号： P338
- 纸质出版日期：2024-06-25，
  
  收稿日期：2023-10-09，
扫描看全文
吕小余, 李占玲, 李昕潼, 等. 基于3种降水产流方案的洪水过程模拟研究以西南地区孙水河流域为例[J]. 西北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024,54(3):366-377.

LYU Xiaoyu, LI Zhanling, LI Xintong, et al. Simulation on flood processes based on three rainfall runoff schemesA case study of Sunshui River Basin in Southwest China[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2024,54(3):366-377.
吕小余, 李占玲, 李昕潼, 等. 基于3种降水产流方案的洪水过程模拟研究以西南地区孙水河流域为例[J]. 西北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024,54(3):366-377. DOI： 10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2024-03-003.

LYU Xiaoyu, LI Zhanling, LI Xintong, et al. Simulation on flood processes based on three rainfall runoff schemesA case study of Sunshui River Basin in Southwest China[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2024,54(3):366-377. DOI： 10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2024-03-003.

摘要

精确模拟洪峰流量和洪水过程线对防洪减灾分析至关重要，其中涉及的降雨损失和产汇流计算往往对洪水过程的模拟最为关键。为评估不同降雨损失模型和产流模型在我国西南地区孙水河流域的适用性，设计了3套降雨产流方案。方案1：SCS曲线数法＋Sndyer单位线法；方案2：初始常速率法＋Clark单位线法；方案3：Green-Ampt法＋SCS单位线法，使用HEC-HMS模型对我国西南地区孙水河流域2007—2018年15场洪水过程进行模拟和分析。结果表明，方案1、方案2对研究区洪水过程线的模拟效果最优，其中方案1对单峰洪水过程的模拟效果更好，方案2对复峰洪水过程的模拟效果更好；方案3模拟效果偏差。论文结果可为相似地区的洪水模拟、预报预警提供参考。

Abstract

Accurate simulation of floodpeak and its hydrograph is crucial for flood control and disaster reduction analysis. The selection of rainfall loss and runoff generation model is often critical for flood process simulation. To evaluate the applicability of different rainfall loss and runoff generation models in the Sunshui River Basin in Southwest China

this study constructed three rainfall-runoff modeling schemes (scheme 1: SCS Curve Number method+ Snyder Unit Hydrograph method

scheme 2: Initial Constant Rate method+ Clark Unit Hydrograph method

scheme 3: Green-Ampt method+ SCS Unit Hydrograph method).The HEC-HMS model was used to simulate 15 flood events from 2007 to 2018. The results showed that Schemes 1 and 2 demonstrated satisfactory performance in simulating the flood hydrographs in the study area

with Scheme 1 performing better for single-peak flood events and Scheme 2 performing better for double-peak flood events. In comparison

Scheme 3 exhibited inadequate simulation performance. The findings of this study can provide reference for flood simulation and prediction in similar areas.

关键词

HEC-HMS孙水河降雨损失产汇流模型

Keywords

HEC-HMSSunshui River Basinrainfall loss modelrunoff generation model

references

SAHU M K, SHWETHA H R, DWARAKISH G S. State-of-the-art hydrological models and application of the HEC-HMS model: A review[J]. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2023, 9(3): 3029-3051.

MISHRA B K, RAFIEI EMAM A, MASSAGO Y, et al. Assessment of future flood inundations under climate and land use change scenarios in the Ciliwung River Basin, Jakarta[J]. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2018, 11(S2): S1105-S1115.

CACAL J C, AUSTRIA V C A, TABOADA E B. Extreme event-based rainfall-runoff simulation utilizing GIS techniques in irawan watershed, Palawan, Philippines[J]. Civil Engineering Journal, 2023, 9(1): 220-232.

CHEAH R, BILLA L, CHAN A, et al.Geospatial modelling of watershed peak flood discharge in Selangor, Malaysia[J]. Water, 2019, 11(12): 2490.

DAI J F, RAD S, XU J X, et al. Impacts of climate change versus land use change on recent Lijiang River flood regime, South China[J]. Tecnología y Ciencias Del Agua, 2021, 12(3): 257-303.

BEKELE W T, HAILE A T, RIENTJES T. Impact of climate change on the streamflow of the Arjo-Didessa catchment under RCP scenarios[J]. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 2021, 12(6): 2325-2337.

马天航, 丁锐, 黄尔, 等. 基于HEC-HMS模型的通口河流域洪水预警研究[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2021, 52(12): 80-89.

MA T H, DING R, HUANG E, et al.Research on flood warning of Tongkou River basin based on HEC-HMS model[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2021, 52(12): 80-89.

司巧灵, 杨传国, 顾荣直, 等. HEC-HMS模型在城市化流域洪水模拟中的应用[J]. 人民长江, 2018, 49(4): 17-22.

SI Q L, YANG C G, GU R Z, et al. Flood simulation of typical urbanized watershed by HEC-HMS model[J]. Yangtze River, 2018, 49(4): 17-22.

程红, 陈兴伟. 东南沿海典型流域台风暴雨洪水预报的HEC-HMS模型[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2022, 32(3): 61-65.

CHENG H, CHEN X W. The HEC-HMS model for typhoon and rainstorm flood forecasting in typical river basins in the southeast coast[J]. China Flood & Drought Management, 2022, 32(3): 61-65.

国家防汛抗旱总指挥部. 中国水旱灾害公报2012[M].北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2013.

白永健, 倪化勇, 王德伟. 孙水河流域地质灾害时空分布及链式规律研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2014, 22(S): 156-163.

BAI Y J, NI H Y, WANG D W. Research on the space-time distribution and chain patterns of geohazards in Sunshui River basin[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2014, 22(S): 156-163.

李琬欣, 熊东红, 张素, 等. 四川凉山州孙水河流域近60年来径流趋势特征分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(2): 130-137.

LI W X, XIONG D H, ZHANG S, et al. Trends analysis of Sunshuihe river basin for the last six decades in Liangshan Prefecture, Sichuan Province[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 34(2): 130-137.

曾义. 孙水河流域水文特征分析[J]. 江苏水利, 2018(3): 69-72.

ZENG Y. Analysis on hydrological characteristics of Sunshui River watershed[J]. Jiangsu Water Resources, 2018(3): 69-72.

王瑞敏, 李红霞, 黄琦, 等. 基于HEC-HMS的西南山区中小河流洪水预报研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2021, 39(1): 79-82.

WANG R M, LI H X, HUANG Q, et al. Flood forecasting of small-medium rivers in Southwest China using HEC-HMS model[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2021, 39(1): 79-82.

EBRAHIMIAN A, GULLIVER J S, WILSON B N. Estimating effective impervious area in urban watersheds using land cover, soil character and asymptotic curve number[J]. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2018, 63(4): 513-526.

史利杰, 陈真, 张国栋. HEC-HMS模型在黄河中游大理河流域适用性研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2020, 42(8): 21-24.

SHI L J, CHEN Z, ZHANG G D. Applicability of HEC-HMS model in Dali River basin in the middle reaches of the Yellow River[J]. Yellow River, 2020, 42(8): 21-24.

MOCKUS V. SCS National Engineering Handbook, Section 4: Hydrology[M].Washington: Soil Conservation Service, 1972.

BELAY Y Y, GOUDAY Y A, ALEMNEW H N. Comparison of HEC-HMS hydrologic model for estimation of runoff computation techniques as a design input: Case of Middle Awash multi-purpose dam, Ethiopia[J]. Applied Water Science, 2022, 12(10): 237.

RAWLS W J, BRAKENSIEK D L, SAXTONN K E. Estimation of soil water properties[J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 1982, 25(5): 1316-1320.

王瑞滢, 胡静, 周末, 等. 基于HEC-HMS模型的西南地区典型中小河流洪水预报研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2022, 40(5): 79-82.

WANG R Y, HU J, ZHOU M, et al. Flood forecasting of typical small-middle rivers in Southwest China based on HEC-HMS model[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2022, 40(5): 79-82.

KAZEYILMAZ-ALHAN C M, YALÇIN I, JAVANSHOUR K, et al. A hydrological model for Ayamama watershed in Istanbul, Turkey, using HEC-HMS[J]. Water Practice and Technology, 2021, 16(1): 154-161.

梁彦宽, 祝雪萍, 孙小平, 等. HEC-HMS模型在岢岚流域的应用研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2022, 44(4): 53-56.

LIANG Y K, ZHU X P, SUN X P, et al. Research and application of HEC-HMS model in Kelan Basin[J]. Yellow River, 2022, 44(4): 53-56.

GUDURU J U, JILO N B, RABBA Z A, et al. Rainfall-runoff modeling using HEC-HMS model for Meki River watershed, rift valley basin, Ethiopia[J]. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 2023, 197: 104743.

彭楚杰. HEC-HMS模型在青山河流域洪水模拟中的应用[J]. 人民珠江, 2021, 42(3): 87-93.

PENG C J. Application of HEC-HMS model in flood simulation of Qingshan River basin[J]. Pearl River, 2021, 42(3): 87-93.

陈涛, 王文彬, 陈壮志. 四川省孙水河流域旱涝周期分析[J]. 四川水利, 2014, 35(4): 37-40.

CHEN T, WANG W B, CHEN Z Z. Analysis of drought and flood cycles in Sunshuihe River basin, Sichuan Province[J]. Sichuan Water Resources, 2014, 35(4): 37-40.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

暂无数据