近20年来黄土高原蒸散发变化规律及其驱动因素
Changes of evapotranspiration and its driving factors in the Loess Plateau in recent 20 years
- 西北大学学报（自然科学版） 2023年53卷第6期 页码：974-990
- 作者机构：
1.西北大学 城市与环境学院，陕西 西安 710127
2.陕西省黄河研究院，陕西 西安 710127
- 作者简介：
[ "宋进喜，博士，二级教授，博士生导师。西北大学城市与环境学院院长，陕西省黄河研究院执行院长，西北大学秦岭研究院常务副院长。入选国家百千万人才工程、国家有突出贡献中青年专家、中国科学院“百人计划”、教育部“新世纪优秀人才支持计划”、陕西省“高层次人才特殊支持计划”科技创新领军人才。陕西省重点科技“旱区流域水文－生态－经济过程与调控创新团队”带头人。主要从事水文学、水资源、水生态及水环境研究。主持国家自然科学基金重点项目等国家和省部级科研课题20余项。发表学术论文180余篇(其中SCI论文120余篇)。研究成果分别荣获陕西省科学技术一等奖(第一完成人)和陕西省自然科学奖一等奖(第一完成人)。《地理学报》、Journal of Environmental Management、《南水北调与水利科技》《中国生态农业学报》《人民黄河》《地域研究与开发》等学术期刊编委。担任陕西省地理学会理事长，中国地理学会水文地理专业委员会副主任、陕西省环境科学学会副理事长、陕西省油气田环境污染控制技术与储层保护重点实验室学术委员会主任等学术职务。" ]
- 基金信息：国家自然科学基金(42041004)
DOI：10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2023-06-008
中图分类号：
扫 描 看 全 文
宋进喜, 高隽清, 李晓鑫, 等. 近20年来黄土高原蒸散发变化规律及其驱动因素[J]. 西北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023,53(6):974-990.
SONG Jinxi, GAO Junqing, LI Xiaoxin, et al. Changes of evapotranspiration and its driving factors in the Loess Plateau in recent 20 years[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2023,53(6):974-990.
宋进喜, 高隽清, 李晓鑫, 等. 近20年来黄土高原蒸散发变化规律及其驱动因素[J]. 西北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023,53(6):974-990. DOI： 10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2023-06-008.
SONG Jinxi, GAO Junqing, LI Xiaoxin, et al. Changes of evapotranspiration and its driving factors in the Loess Plateau in recent 20 years[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2023,53(6):974-990. DOI： 10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2023-06-008.
摘要
由于气候变化与人类活动的影响，黄土高原蒸散发（evapotranspiration）及其组分发生了显著变化，进而影响了流域水文过程及其水资源可持续利用。该文基于多元数据融合，采用变化趋势分析和多元回归残差分析等方法，分析了2001—2020年黄土高原蒸散发及其组分的变化特征，以及其对气候变化和人类活动的响应机理。结果表明，2001—2020年黄土高原蒸散发年均增长2.869 4 mm（,R,2,=0.384 6），影响其变化的因子主要有非植被下垫面、饱和水汽压差和降雨，贡献率分别为23.47%、21.31%和12.22%；植被蒸腾呈增长趋势，且占比增加，年均增长3.716 5 mm（,R,2,=0.527 1），影响其变化的因子主要有非植被下垫面、饱和水汽压差和植被，贡献率分别为22.13%、19.43%和15.86%；截留蒸发也呈增长趋势，年均增长0.354 mm（,R,2,=0.694 6），且占比增加，影响其变化的因子主要有非植被下垫面、植被和饱和水汽压差，贡献率分别为22.24%、13.85%和12.47%；土壤蒸发呈下降趋势，年均下降1.405 4 mm（,R,2,=0.741 5），且占比减少，影响其变化的因子主要有非植被下垫面、植被和饱和水汽压差，贡献率分别为28.29%、19.15%和13.66%。整体来看，气候变化仍是影响黄土高原蒸散发变化最主要的因素，其中饱和水汽压差是影响蒸散发及其组分最大的气象要素，植被变化和非植被下垫面因子的作用也不可忽视。研究结论可为科学认识黄土高原蒸散发变化机理以及促进水资源可持续利用管理提供理论依据。
Abstract
Due to the influence of climate change and human activities, evapotranspiration and its components have changed significantly in the Loess Plateau, which has affected the hydrological process and sustainable utilization of water resources in the basin. Based on multivariate data fusion, trend analysis and multiple regression residual analysis are used to analyze the characteristics of evapotranspiration and its components in the Loess Plateau from 2001 to 2020 and their response mechanism to climate change and human activities. The average annual increase of evapotranspiration on the Loess Plateau from 2001 to 2020 was 2.869 4 mm (,R,2,=0.384 6), and the main factors affecting the change were non-vegetation underlying surface, saturated water vapor pressure and rainfall, with the contribution rates of 23.47%, 21.31% and 12.22%, respectively.Vegetation transpiration showed an increasing trend and its proportion increased, with an annual growth rate of 3.716 5 mm/a (,R,2,=0.527 1). The main factors affecting its change were non-vegetation underlying surface, saturated water vapor pressure and vegetation, and the contribution rates were 22.13%, 19.43% and 15.86%. The interception loss also showed a significant increase trend, increasing by 0.354 mm (,R,2,=0.694 6) per year, and its proportion increased. The main factors affecting its change were non-vegetation underlying surface, vegetation and saturated water vapor pressure, and the contribution rates were 22.24%, 13.85% and 12.47%soil evaporation decreased by 1.405 4 mm (,R,2,=0.741 5) year by year, and its proportion decreased. The main factors affecting its change were non-vegetation underlying surface, vegetation and saturated water vapor pressure, and the contribution rates were 28.29%, 19.15% and 13.66%.In conclusion, climate change is still the most important factor affecting evapotranspiration and its components on the Loess Plateau, and saturated water vapor pressure is the biggest meteorological factor, the role of vegetation change and non-vegetation underlying surface factors can not be ignored.This study can provide theoretical basis for scientific understanding of evapotranspiration change mechanism and promoting sustainable utilization and management of water resources on the Loess Plateau.
关键词
气候变化人类活动蒸散发残差分析黄土高原
Keywords
climate changehuman activitiesevapotranspirationresidual analysisLoess Plateau
references
FISHER J B, MELTON F, MIDDLETON E, et al. The future of evapotranspiration: Global requirements for ecosystem functioning, carbon and climate feedbacks, agricultural management, and water resources[J]. Water Resources Research, 2017, 53(4): 2618-2626.
刘静, 温仲明, 刚成诚. 黄土高原不同植被覆被类型NDVI对气候变化的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(2): 678-691.
LIU J, WEN Z M, GANG C C. Normalized difference vegetation index of different vegetation cover types and its responses to climate change in the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(2): 678-691.
WANG Y Q, SHAO M A, ZHU Y J, et al. Impacts of land use and plant characteristics on dried soil layers in different climatic regions on the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2011, 151(4): 437-448.
ZHANG B Q, HE C S, BURNHAM M, et al. Evaluating the coupling effects of climate aridity and vegetation restoration on soil erosion over the Loess Plateau in China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 539: 436-449.
FENG X M, FU B J, PIAO S L, et al. Revegetation in China’s Loess Plateau is approaching sustainable water resource limits[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6(11): 1019-1022.
CHEN Y P, WANG K B, LIN Y S, et al. Balancing green and grain trade[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2015, 8(10): 739-741.
ZHANG B Q, WU P, ZHAO X N, et al. Assessing the spatial and temporal variation of the rainwater harvesting potential (1971—2010) on the Chinese Loess Plateau using the VIC model[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2014, 28(3): 534-544.
CAO S, CHEN L, YU X. Impact of China’s grain for green project on the landscape of vulnerable arid and semi-arid agricultural regions: A case study in northern Shaanxi Province[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009, 46(3): 536-543.
王丽霞, 夏鹏宇, 杨潇, 等. 渭河流域蒸散发时空反演及其对人类活动的响应[J/OL]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 1-18[2023-10-14]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/10.1746.TV.20230705.1251.004.htmlhttp://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/10.1746.TV.20230705.1251.004.html.
WANG L X, XIA P Y, YANG X, et al. Spatial-temporal inversion of evapotranspiration in the Weihe River basin and its response to human activities[J/OL]Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 1-18[2023-10-14]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/10.1746.TV.20230705.1251.004.htmlhttp://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/10.1746.TV.20230705.1251.004.html.
杨凡, 刘小飞, 刘战东, 等. 基于Priestley-Taylor模型的豫北玉米生长季水热通量研究[J]. 节水灌溉, 2023(11): 115-120.
YANG F, LIU X F, LIU Z D, et al.Research on the changes in water and heat flux summer corn season in northern Henan Province based on Priestley-Taylor model[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2023(11): 115-120.
唐家琦, 王成杰. 荒漠草原区显热通量变化特征及源区分布[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(1): 239-251.
TANG J Q, WANG C J. Characterization of variations of sensible heat flux and its source area distribution over the desert steppe[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(1): 239-251.
王韦娜, 张翔, 张立锋, 等. 蒸渗仪法和涡度相关法测定蒸散的比较[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(11): 3551-3559.
WANG W N, ZHANG X, ZHANG L F, et al.A comparison study of the evapotranspiration measured by lysimeter and eddy covariance[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2019, 38(11): 3551-3559.
常晓格, 王志慧, 肖培青, 等. 黄土高原生态系统水分利用效率演变及驱动因素空间分异规律[J]. 水土保持研究, 2022, 29(5): 244-252.
CHANG X G, WANG Z H, XIAO P Q, et al. Spatial variation patterns of water use efficiency of ecosystem and its drivers on the Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 29(5): 244-252.
LI X Y, ZOU L, XIA J, et al. Untangling the effects of climate change and land use/cover change on spatiotemporal variation of evapotranspiration over China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2022, 612: 128189.
蔡依霏, 陈琳舒, 吕世轩, 等. 基于Google Earth Engine的黄土高原植被变化对蒸散发分量影响研究[J]. 地理科学, 2023, 43(9): 1649-1658.
CAI Y F, CHEN L S, LYU S X, et al.Impact of vegetation change on evapotranspiration components in the Loess Plateau based on google earth engine[J]. Scientia Geographica Inica, 2023, 43(9): 1649-1658.
袁瑞瑞, 黄萧霖, 郝璐. 近40年中国饱和水汽压差时空变化及影响因素分析[J]. 气候与环境研究, 2021, 26(4): 413-424.
YUAN R R, HUANG X L, HAO L, et al.Spatio-temporal variation of vapor pressure deficit and impact factors in China in the past 40 years[J]. Climaticand Environmental Research, 2021, 26(4): 413-424.
YANG X Q, YONG B, REN L L, et al. Multi-scale validation of GLEAM evapotranspiration products over China via China flux ET measurements[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2017, 38(20): 5688-5709.
杨泽龙, 李艳忠, 白鹏, 等.1980—2020年中国九大流域蒸散发及其组分时空评估[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2022, 24(5): 889-901.
YANG Z L, LI Y Z, BAI P, et al. Spatial-temporal dynamics of evapotranspiration and its components in nine river basins in China from 1980 to 2020 based on Gleam-ET products[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2022, 24(5): 889-901.
金凯, 王飞, 韩剑桥, 等.1982—2015年中国气候变化和人类活动对植被NDVI变化的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(5): 961-974.
JIN K, WANG F, HAN J, et al.Contribution of climatic change and human activities tovegetation NDVI change over China during 1982—2015[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(5): 961-974.
林楠, 姜然哲, 刘强, 等. 近20年三江平原地表蒸散发时空特征及驱动因素分析[J]. 中国地质, 2021, 48(5): 1392-1407.
LIN N, JIANG R Z, LIU Q, et al. Spatio-temporal characteristics and driving factors of surface evapotranspiration in Sanjiang Plain in recent 20 years[J]. Geology in China, 48(5): 1392-1407.
邵蕊. 黄土高原大规模植被恢复的区域蒸散耗水规律及其生态水文效应[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2020.
白萌, 莫淑红, 莫兴国, 等. 退耕还林背景下黄土高原蒸散量时空演变特征及归因[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(20): 8344-8358.
BAI M, MO S H, MO X G, et al. Spatio-temporal variation of evapotranspiration and its attribution over the Loess Plateau since the implementation of the grain for green project[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(20): 8344-8358.
王凯利, 王志慧, 肖培青, 等. 气候与下垫面变化对黄土高原蒸散发变化的影响评估[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(3): 166-172.
WANG K L, WANG Z H, XIAO P Q, et al. Assessment on the impact of climate and the changes of underlying surface on the evapotranspiration in the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 36(3): 166-172.
QIU L J, WU Y P, SHI Z Y, et al. Quantifying the responses of evapotranspiration and its components to vegetation restoration and climate change on the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(12): 2358.
韩典辰, 张方敏, 陈吉泉, 等. 内蒙古半干旱区蒸散估算和归因分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(4): 1071-1081.
HAN D C, ZHANG F M, CHEN J Q, et al. Evapotranspiration of a semi-arid iandscape in Inner Mongolia: Estimation and attribution[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(4): 1071-1081.
LI S J, WANG G J, SUN S L, et al. Long-term changes in evapotranspiration over China and attribution to climatic drivers during 1980—2010[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2021, 595: 126037.
赵文玥, 吉喜斌. 干旱区稀疏树木冠层降雨截留蒸发的研究进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(8): 862-879.
ZHAO W Y, JI X B. A review of research advances and future perspectives of evaporation of intercepted rainfall from sparsetree canopy in drylands[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2021, 36(8): 862-879.
肖薇薇, 安彬.1960—2017年黄土高原地区风速时空变化特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2023, 30(4): 103-109.
XIAO W W, AN B, et al. Spatio-temporal variability of wind speed in the Loess Plateau during 1960—2017[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 30(4): 103-109.
祝晨佳, 高吉喜. 土壤蒸发影响因素及抑制途径研究综述[J/OL]. 环境保护科学, 1-11[2023-10-14]. https://doi.org/10.16803/j.cnki.issn.1004-6216.202305026https://doi.org/10.16803/j.cnki.issn.1004-6216.202305026.
ZHU C J, GAO J X. A review of the factors affecting soil evaporation and its inhibition methods[J/OL]. Environmental Protection Science, 1-11[2023-10-14]. https://doi.org/10.16803/j.cnki.issn.1004-6216.202305026https://doi.org/10.16803/j.cnki.issn.1004-6216.202305026.
陈林, 杨新国, 王磊, 等. 荒漠草原不同植物群落蒸散组分特征及其环境因子影响分析[J/OL]. 生态学报, 1-14[2023-10-14]. https://doi.org/10.20103/j.stxb.202211293445https://doi.org/10.20103/j.stxb.202211293445.
CHEN L, YANG X G, WANG L, et al. Characteristics of evapotranspiration components of different plant communities in desert steppe and its relationship with environmental factors[J/OL]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1-14[2023-10-14]. https://doi.org/10.20103/j.stxb.202211293445https://doi.org/10.20103/j.stxb.202211293445.
ZHAO F B, MA S, WU Y D, et al. The role of climate change and vegetation greening on evapotranspiration variation in the Yellow River Basin, China[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2022, 316.
吕美霞, 马柱国, 李明星. 气候变化、植被改变及人类用水与黄河流域水循环的研究进展[J/OL]. 大气科学学报, 1-14[2023-10-14]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1803.P.20231007.0914.002.htmlhttp://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1803.P.20231007.0914.002.html.
LYU M X, MA Z G, LI M X. Research progress on climate change, vegetation change, human water use and water cycle in the Yellow River Basin[J/OL]. Transactions of Atmospheric Sciences, 1-14[2023-10-14]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1803.P.20231007.0914.002.htmlhttp://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1803.P.20231007.0914.002.html.
陈惠玲. 基于SiTH模型的全球陆地蒸散发时空变化特征及其驱动机制研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2023.
姚楠, 董国涛, 薛华柱. 基于Google Earth Engine的黄土高原植被覆盖度时空变化特征分析[J/OL]. 水土保持研究, 1-9[2023-10-14]. https://doi.org/10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.01.045https://doi.org/10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.01.045.
YAO N, DONG G T, XUE H Z. Analysis on the characteristics of the spatiotemporal change in vegetation coverage on the Loess Plateau using the google earth engine[J/OL]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 1-9[2023-10-14]. https://doi.org/10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.01.045https://doi.org/10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.01.045.
YANG Z L, BAI P, LI Y Z. Quantifying the effect of vegetation greening on evapotranspiration and its components on the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2022, 613: 128446.
崔泽鹏, 王志慧, 肖培青, 等.2000—2018年黄河上中游地区蒸散发年际时空变化及其影响因素分析[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2022, 37(4): 865-877.
CUI Z P, WANG Z H, XIAO P Y, et al. Analysis of spatio-temporal dynamics of interannual evapotranspiration and its influencing factors in the upper and middle reaches of the Yellow River from 2000 to 2018[J]. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 2022, 37(4): 865-877.
白乐, 殷会娟, 李昭悦, 等. 黄土丘陵区淤地坝作用下地下水位动态演化特征[J]. 人民黄河, 2021, 43(3): 74-77.
BAI L, YIN H J, LI Z Y, et al. Dynamic evolution characteristics of groundwater level under the action of warping dam in loess hilly area[J]. Yellow River, 2021, 43(3): 74-77.
刘宏鑫, 杨永民, 龙爱华, 等. 基于站点观测和水量平衡的四种蒸散发产品在我国的评估与对比[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2023, 54(3): 72-84.
LIU H X, YANG Y M, LONG A H, et al. Verification and comparison of four evapotranspiration products based on eddy covariance observations and water balance method[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2023, 54(3): 72-84.
王亚琴, 杨巍, 邢博, 等. Budyko框架下黄河流域蒸散发时空变化影响因素研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2023, 50(2): 23-33.
WANG Y Q, YANG W, XING B, et al. A study of influencing factors of spatio-temporal evapotranspiration variation across the Yellow River basin under the budyko framework[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2023, 50(2): 23-33.
赵卓怡, 郝兴明. 基于Priestley-Taylor方法的中亚干旱区实际蒸散特征及归因[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(7): 1085-1093.
ZHAO Z Y, HAO X M. Actual evapotranspiration characteristics and attribution in arid central asia based on the Priestley-Taylor method[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(7): 1085-1093.
杨洁, 裴婷婷. 气候和植被变化对黄土高原蒸散发的影响[J]. 草原与草坪, 2018, 38(2): 61-65.
YANG J, PEI T T. The impacts of climate and vegetation change on evapotranspiration in Loess Plateau, China[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2018, 38(2): 61-65.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
- 网络PDF下载
- Meta-XML下载
- BibTeX下载
- Endnote下载
- RefMan 下载
- NoteExpress下载
- NoteFirst下载
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
- 地址：陕西省西安市太白北路229号
- 联系电话：029-88302822 Email：xdxbzr@nwu.edu.cn
- 技术支持由北京北大方正电子有限公司提供 陕ICP备05010980号-4
京公网安备11010802024621 - 本系统建议在Chrome、 IE9+ 以上版本浏览器阅读本站内容，360浏览器请切换至极速模式
- Cookies帮助我们提供服务并提供个性化体验。使用本网站，即表示您同意我们使用Cookies